Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2010 11:29:48 GMT -5
OK I've been thinking about this for a while but do you think it's time for Velvet to try her luck in the WWE?
Yes I'm aware of how WWE treats former TNA talent but maybe just maybe they will make an exception for Velvet. I'm also aware that she tried many times to get work with them but maybe they will giver her a shot this time. If Velvet was in the WWE I would have a reason to watch every week and we could finally have Velvet / Maryse interaction plus she would get more media exposure from being in the WWE and possibly a chance to be Divas champion.
So what do you all think?
|
|
|
Post by Brandon on Dec 10, 2010 12:21:29 GMT -5
Stay. Velvet in WWE would mean no mic time, no Spin Cycle, no cleavage, no middle rope grinding, no Angelina. That's not a Velvet Sky I want to get behind.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2010 13:28:38 GMT -5
I suppose your right Velvet Clause. But those spoilers from last night just really upset me about how Velvet is currently being used in TNA.
All I wanted was for her and Angelina to finally win the KO tag titles together. Was that too much to ask?
|
|
|
Post by Angelwings on Dec 10, 2010 15:42:24 GMT -5
I think I'd also say stay. For one, her leaving would end the original Beautiful People era for good. Angel and Velvet have a special chemistry and have done so much with (and occasionally against) each other.
Honestly, after Angelina and Velvet are done with wrestling, I might very well call it a life far as supporting wrestling too. Years of watching Trish Stratus followed by years more watching the original Beautiful People is untouchable and there's probably nowhere to go but downward.
Sides, Velvet signed a new contract this last spring. Plus, as said, the E doesn't exactly use it's women wisely to boot.
|
|
|
Post by Burke on Dec 10, 2010 17:22:48 GMT -5
Yeah, she should probably stay in TNA. If she went to WWE they would probably bring her in as LayCool’s new “apprentice” or some other equally demeaning kind of role.
|
|